From: Mike Wright <mike.wright@mailinator.com>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Conntrack not recording packets going through a firewall
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:22:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497791FC.5040301@mailinator.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1ace6860901211233h7a978638g86e891e25991b4d4@mail.gmail.com>
David J Craigon wrote:
> well whatever. Routing, schmoting. If I turn off IPTables, everything
> can see everything else fine.
The reason you need routing statements is because your /24 networks
can't see each other.
Put them on the SAME subnet or route them. Easy, no?
ps: -1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-21 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 14:32 Conntrack not recording packets going through a firewall David J Craigon
2009-01-21 16:49 ` Mike Wright
2009-01-21 17:20 ` David J Craigon
2009-01-21 17:37 ` David J Craigon
2009-01-21 18:36 ` Mike Wright
2009-01-21 20:33 ` David J Craigon
2009-01-21 21:22 ` Mike Wright [this message]
2009-01-21 22:23 ` David J Craigon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497791FC.5040301@mailinator.com \
--to=mike.wright@mailinator.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.