From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] udp: optimize bind(0) if many ports are in use
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:20:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497D724F.3070902@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4979C9B6.3080302@cosmosbay.com>
Hello David
Here is last patch about performance regression of UDP bind() to random port.
Change against previous one is the divide, that can be replaced by a multiply,
as already done in other parts of kernel.
ie instead of doing : "first = rand % remaining + low;" we can use :
first = (((u64)rand * remaining) >> 32) + low;
Also some polishing about too long lines and comments before official submission.
Thank you
[PATCH] udp: optimize bind(0) if many ports are in use
commit 9088c5609584684149f3fb5b065aa7f18dcb03ff
(udp: Improve port randomization) introduced a regression for UDP bind() syscall
to null port (getting a random port) in case lot of ports are already in use.
This is because we do about 28000 scans of very long chains (220 sockets per chain),
with many spin_lock_bh()/spin_unlock_bh() calls.
Fix this using a bitmap (64 bytes for current value of UDP_HTABLE_SIZE)
so that we scan chains at most once.
Instead of 250 ms per bind() call, we get after patch a time of 2.9 ms
Based on a report from Vitaly Mayatskikh
Reported-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Tested-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index cf5ab05..b7faffe 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -120,8 +120,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sysctl_udp_wmem_min);
atomic_t udp_memory_allocated;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(udp_memory_allocated);
+#define PORTS_PER_CHAIN (65536 / UDP_HTABLE_SIZE)
+
static int udp_lib_lport_inuse(struct net *net, __u16 num,
const struct udp_hslot *hslot,
+ unsigned long *bitmap,
struct sock *sk,
int (*saddr_comp)(const struct sock *sk1,
const struct sock *sk2))
@@ -132,12 +135,17 @@ static int udp_lib_lport_inuse(struct net *net, __u16 num,
sk_nulls_for_each(sk2, node, &hslot->head)
if (net_eq(sock_net(sk2), net) &&
sk2 != sk &&
- sk2->sk_hash == num &&
+ (bitmap || sk2->sk_hash == num) &&
(!sk2->sk_reuse || !sk->sk_reuse) &&
(!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if || !sk->sk_bound_dev_if
|| sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == sk->sk_bound_dev_if) &&
- (*saddr_comp)(sk, sk2))
- return 1;
+ (*saddr_comp)(sk, sk2)) {
+ if (bitmap)
+ __set_bit(sk2->sk_hash / UDP_HTABLE_SIZE,
+ bitmap);
+ else
+ return 1;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -160,32 +168,47 @@ int udp_lib_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum,
if (!snum) {
int low, high, remaining;
unsigned rand;
- unsigned short first;
+ unsigned short first, last;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, PORTS_PER_CHAIN);
inet_get_local_port_range(&low, &high);
remaining = (high - low) + 1;
rand = net_random();
- snum = first = rand % remaining + low;
- rand |= 1;
- for (;;) {
- hslot = &udptable->hash[udp_hashfn(net, snum)];
+ first = (((u64)rand * remaining) >> 32) + low;
+ /*
+ * force rand to be an odd multiple of UDP_HTABLE_SIZE
+ */
+ rand = (rand | 1) * UDP_HTABLE_SIZE;
+ for (last = first + UDP_HTABLE_SIZE; first != last; first++) {
+ hslot = &udptable->hash[udp_hashfn(net, first)];
+ bitmap_zero(bitmap, PORTS_PER_CHAIN);
spin_lock_bh(&hslot->lock);
- if (!udp_lib_lport_inuse(net, snum, hslot, sk, saddr_comp))
- break;
- spin_unlock_bh(&hslot->lock);
+ udp_lib_lport_inuse(net, snum, hslot, bitmap, sk,
+ saddr_comp);
+
+ snum = first;
+ /*
+ * Iterate on all possible values of snum for this hash.
+ * Using steps of an odd multiple of UDP_HTABLE_SIZE
+ * give us randomization and full range coverage.
+ */
do {
- snum = snum + rand;
- } while (snum < low || snum > high);
- if (snum == first)
- goto fail;
+ if (low <= snum && snum <= high &&
+ !test_bit(snum / UDP_HTABLE_SIZE, bitmap))
+ goto found;
+ snum += rand;
+ } while (snum != first);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&hslot->lock);
}
+ goto fail;
} else {
hslot = &udptable->hash[udp_hashfn(net, snum)];
spin_lock_bh(&hslot->lock);
- if (udp_lib_lport_inuse(net, snum, hslot, sk, saddr_comp))
+ if (udp_lib_lport_inuse(net, snum, hslot, NULL, sk, saddr_comp))
goto fail_unlock;
}
+found:
inet_sk(sk)->num = snum;
sk->sk_hash = snum;
if (sk_unhashed(sk)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-26 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-22 18:49 speed regression in udp_lib_lport_inuse() Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-01-22 22:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-22 22:14 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-23 0:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-22 22:40 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-01-23 0:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-23 9:42 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-01-23 11:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-23 13:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-23 14:56 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-01-23 16:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-23 16:14 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-01-26 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-01-27 5:35 ` [PATCH] udp: optimize bind(0) if many ports are in use David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497D724F.3070902@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v.mayatskih@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.