All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+list@rabbit.us>
Cc: thomas62186218@aol.com, soltys@ziu.info, mauermann@gmail.com,
	keld@dkuug.dk, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LVM on raid10,f2 performance issues
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:06:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <497E099B.5060805@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49742B94.8090407@rabbit.us>

Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> thomas62186218@aol.com wrote:
>   
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I too was seeing miserable read-performance with LVM2 volumes on top of
>> md RAID 10's on my Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit machine. My RAID 10 has 12 x 300GB
>> 15K SAS drives on a 4-port LSI PCIe SAS controller.
>>
>> I use:
>> blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md0
>>
>> And this dramatically increased my RAID 10 read performance.
>>
>> You MUST do the same for your LVM2 volumes for them to see a comparable
>> performance boost.
>>
>> blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/mapper/raid10-testvol
>>
>>     
>
> This is incorrect. Only the readahead setting of the _last_ block device
> matters. So in case you have a raid6 of 10 drives, with LUKS on top,
> with LVM on top - only the readahead settings of the individual LVs
> matter, nothing further down the chain is consulted.

I have some old numbers which indicate that with ext3 the use of 
"stride=" can improve performance, although I was measuring write and 
just got the read numbers without really caring about them.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
  be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark 



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-26 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-01  0:00 LVM on raid10,f2 performance issues Holger Mauermann
2008-12-01 16:42 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-12-02 23:28   ` Holger Mauermann
2008-12-03  7:15     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-12-03  9:43     ` Michal Soltys
2009-01-19  1:24       ` thomas62186218
2009-01-19  7:28         ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-01-26 19:06           ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2009-01-19  7:30         ` Michal Soltys
2009-01-19 12:17         ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-01-19 12:24           ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-01-19 13:59             ` Keld Jørn Simonsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=497E099B.5060805@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=keld@dkuug.dk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mauermann@gmail.com \
    --cc=rabbit+list@rabbit.us \
    --cc=soltys@ziu.info \
    --cc=thomas62186218@aol.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.