From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide/libata: fix ata_id_is_cfa() (take 3) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:16:38 +0300 Message-ID: <497F3366.5020608@ru.mvista.com> References: <200901271619.53025.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <20090127133841.2405e649@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <497F2EAD.4080705@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:34523 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751011AbZA0QQJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:16:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <497F2EAD.4080705@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Alan Cox , bzolnier@gmail.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, gdu@mns.spb.ru Mark Lord wrote: >>> When checking for the CFA feature set support, ata_id_is_cfa() tests >>> bit 2 in >>> word 82 of the identify data instead the word 83; it also checks the >>> ATA/PI >>> version support in the word 80 (which the CompactFlash specifications >>> have as >>> reserved), this having no slightest chance to work on the modern CF >>> cards that >>> don't have 0x848A in the word 0... >>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov >> Acked-by: Alan Cox > .. > Any chance you two could figure out this one below? > It *is* a CF card, but doesn't show up as such. > /dev/sda: > 044a 3fff 0000 000f 0000 0240 003f 03bc > 0000 0000 5052 4554 4543 2020 2020 2020 > 3031 3233 3541 4545 0002 0002 0004 3230 > 3038 3038 3035 4346 2020 2020 2020 2020 > 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 > 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 8001 > 0000 0300 0000 0200 0000 0007 3fff 000f > 003f 3c4f 00ec 0100 0000 03bc 0000 0007 > 0003 0078 0078 0078 0078 0000 0000 0000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0010 0000 700b 400c 4003 0001 0000 0003 ATA device, with non-removable media Model Number: CF Serial Number: PRETEC 01235AEE Firmware Revision: 20080805 Standards: Supported: 4 Likely used: 6 Here's what I was afraid of: it does report the ATA revision in word 80. Otherwise, it seems pretty standard modern CF. What are we to do now, Alan? > 207f 0001 0000 0000 fffe 600f 0000 0000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0009 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 81f4 0000 0000 0092 001b 0000 0000 0000 Here are the words 160-167.; word 163 reports PIO6 and MWDMA3 max, PIO6 selected... MBR, Sergei