From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [mingo@elte.hu: [git pull] headers_check fixes]
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:12:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497FA2F5.2040806@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901271527340.3123@localhost.localdomain>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Do you think the "fix headers_check" patches spend lots of time analyzing
> things? I bet no. They just try to make the warning go away, so you don't
> actually end up with any more "coverage" anyway. Quite the reverse -
> instead of having a simple rule ("CONFIG_xyz options simply do not exist
> in user space"), you end up having ad-hoc hacks on a per-fix basis.
>
This is probably true. I think we should add this as one more of the
preprocessing rules which we really should just do, as well as automatic
mangling of integer types.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-28 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090127222825.GA27097@elte.hu>
2009-01-27 22:57 ` [mingo@elte.hu: [git pull] headers_check fixes] Linus Torvalds
2009-01-27 23:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-27 23:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-28 0:12 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-01-28 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-28 1:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-27 23:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 23:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-27 23:51 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-01-30 14:01 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-30 18:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-28 0:03 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-28 1:36 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-28 12:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-28 17:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 19:22 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-28 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-28 20:03 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-28 21:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 21:58 ` [PATCH] x86: do not expose CONFIG_BSWAP to userspace Harvey Harrison
2009-01-28 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-28 22:40 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-30 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-28 22:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 22:38 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-28 23:04 ` Ben Pfaff
2009-01-30 18:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 23:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 23:36 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-28 23:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-03 18:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-31 18:43 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-01-31 20:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 23:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-28 23:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 20:49 ` [mingo@elte.hu: [git pull] headers_check fixes] Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-28 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 21:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497FA2F5.2040806@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jaswinderrajput@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.