From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Something weird is happening... Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:36:24 -0800 Message-ID: <49822F68.9000106@zytor.com> References: <49814BA4.6030705@zytor.com> <7vfxj1eqh6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090129223410.GA1465@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Ingo Molnar X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 29 23:38:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LSfWW-0007TG-Pg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:38:13 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754017AbZA2Wgm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:36:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753373AbZA2Wgm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:36:42 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:36141 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753370AbZA2Wgl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:36:41 -0500 Received: from anacreon.sc.intel.com (hpa@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n0TMaOj3024169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:36:26 -0800 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <20090129223410.GA1465@elte.hu> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/8920/Thu Jan 29 10:30:26 2009 on terminus.zytor.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> But that is just a conjecture from a cursory looking at the current >> code. I do not remember (or did not know from the beginning) some >> details of it. And that is why I asked you if "git fsck --full" reports >> it missing in my earlier response to you. > > sorry i did not follow up on that detail. I ran --full yesterday already > (before we reported this), and besides taking a lot longer to finish it > reported the same screenful of problems. > > Should i send the output of it? (i started it, it will take some time to > finish) I didn't get the "missing" message with git fsck --full. I get the "dangling" messages, still, but that is more or less expected. -hpa