From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cl@linux-foundation.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: fix allocating page cache/slab object on the unallowed node when memory spread is set
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:31:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4989606F.9030804@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830902031449j1fa3dd08re842b57f8700b389@mail.gmail.com>
on 2009-2-4 6:49 Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:25:25 +0800
>> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> I wasn't able to find out where the setting of init'smems_allowed
>> happens, after a bit of grepping and hunting. It should be done within
>> INIT_TASK, but isn't.
>>
>> Still, kthreadd is reliably parented by swapper, and there shold be no
>> need to alter its mems_allowed.
>>
>> Similarly, what was the reason for setting current->mems_allowed in
>> kernel_init()? That also should be unneeded.
>>
>> Finally, I've somewhat lost track of where we are with this patch.
>> Paul, do you see any other remaining issues?
>
> AFAICS this patch still has a race between a thread reading its
> mems_allowed, and another thread updating it. The current architecture
> of having task->mems_allowed be only updatable by current was PaulJ's
> code originally, and I'm a bit loathe to touch it. But if we're going
> to, we'll need at the minimum to add a lock for any code that touches
> current->mems_allowed.
Agree! But mems_allowed is touched in the module of memory management
in general, adding a lock to protect mems_allowed may lead to performance
regression.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 8:06 [PATCH] cpuset: fix allocating page cache/slab object on the unallowed node when memory spread is set Miao Xie
2009-01-21 8:30 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-21 10:41 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-03 3:05 ` Miao Xie
2009-01-27 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-03 3:25 ` Miao Xie
2009-02-03 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-03 22:49 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-04 9:31 ` Miao Xie [this message]
2009-02-06 19:19 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-09 4:02 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10 11:37 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-12 0:54 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 1:19 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-12 1:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 1:58 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-12 8:23 ` Miao Xie
2009-02-12 21:53 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-12 8:27 ` Miao Xie
2009-02-12 10:40 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 5:57 ` Miao Xie
2009-02-12 11:06 ` Paul Jackson
2009-02-04 9:03 ` Miao Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4989606F.9030804@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.