Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: do not consider diverging submodules a 'dirty worktree'

[Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>]

Junio C Hamano schrieb:
> If so, why do we even check dirtiness of anything at all?
> 
> This is not a "wouldn't this better?" proposal patch, but a "why isn't the
> patch like this?" question patch.
> 
>  git-filter-branch.sh |    6 ------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git i/git-filter-branch.sh w/git-filter-branch.sh
> index eb62f71..dda32e0 100755
> --- i/git-filter-branch.sh
> +++ w/git-filter-branch.sh
> @@ -107,12 +107,6 @@ USAGE="[--env-filter <command>] [--tree-filter <command>] \
>  OPTIONS_SPEC=
>  . git-sh-setup
>  
> -if [ "$(is_bare_repository)" = false ]; then
> -	git diff-files --quiet &&
> -	git diff-index --cached --quiet HEAD -- ||
> -	die "Cannot rewrite branch(es) with a dirty working directory."
> -fi
> -
>  tempdir=.git-rewrite
>  filter_env=
>  filter_tree=

Because if the repository is non-bare, then filter-branch updates the
work-tree at the end of the run; we don't want to overwrite uncommitted
work in this case.

This behavior is a relic from cg-admin-rewritehist, I think. I've never
found it useful.

-- Hannes