From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1LUmJz-0005Lu-LA for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:17:59 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUmHe-0004Cx-ID for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:15:34 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUmHc-0004Al-Dy for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:15:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51402 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUmHc-0004Ab-7f for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:15:32 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:20261) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUmHb-0006DX-MX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:15:31 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so1449311fgb.30 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:15:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TZ2DWdV6apE1wPJZHNBE1gT4UEVNDwtICx8m1jjkFZA=; b=u+0WPPrN33vlrqNYK9EJ6l5i702K8U1Wtx3s9iGZi8hDrcskf0CwD3AQU//D9J6TK6 x1LY3l11zyrkgWwSWZgVj1bB9TuiYcNPErYiq7Imp/o8tf+ZvaIv3M9sfeFv20NIGHhN GG3uW0A8AQC4rHFlcgN13J65aOENNjSQSsIhs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eBJY/ASq8MAfywOS+p20Ik8f41eVXoanMfnpiGM/Z41rkM8jfFXmimXtbwF6sxgkoO ruwEpgBEHKLQhXWP7D1I2GBTGZxdA9wsP1Tu4tGYHHPW933pX7Tp5O7l9ihEWmxOML6/ FnSdNKl4P7rsu/v90cMKKrnln7DNFjeyzDO/g= Received: by 10.86.66.9 with SMTP id o9mr1820329fga.14.1233771330426; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:15:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.25? (119-114.62-81.cust.bluewin.ch [81.62.114.119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm7404472fga.10.2009.02.04.10.15.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:15:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4989DB40.9080205@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:15:28 +0100 From: phcoder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <498983B3.8090904@gmail.com> <1233765129.2487.10.camel@dv> In-Reply-To: <1233765129.2487.10.camel@dv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: Remove trailing space from FAT label X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:15:34 -0000 Hello > Suppose the label is "DOS \0DDDDDDDD", Such a label is incorrect. But I agree with you that we should reuse the code and be fault-tolerant (I regularly see FAT volumes breaking the specifications). Additionally there is a mechanism of nice fat label which works the same way as long names (supported only by some OS). Unifying the code would make these labels accessible. So I'll write a new proposition soon. Thanks Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko