All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tsec: Wait for auto-negotiation to complete without link
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:00:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <498A100E.4080807@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090204215831.057128322908@gemini.denx.de>

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood,
> 
> In message <498A0D5C.5060901@freescale.com> you wrote:
>> Andy Fleming wrote:
>>> Hmmm....I made that change for a reason.  Waiting for autonegotiation
>>> to finish on a tsec with no link was quite tiresome.  If you've hooked
>>> up the 4th tsec, and try to boot, you end up waiting for *three* tsecs
>>> to timeout.  If dhcp fails because the link isn't up you can always
>>> try again, or add a delay before dhcp starts so that the link is up.
>>>
>>> I'm open to other suggestions, but I really don't want to go back to
>>> the old behavior.
>> Is there any way that you could do the auto-negotiation in parallel?
> 
> You definitely do not want to do that.
> 
> Requirement is NOT to initialize network interfaces unless used by
> U-Boot.

This would be in a case where the user *asks* for all the network 
interfaces to be used.  How is it different than the current behavior of 
rotating on a timeout?

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-04 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-04 21:14 [U-Boot] [PATCH] tsec: Wait for auto-negotiation to complete without link Peter Tyser
2009-02-04 21:20 ` Andy Fleming
2009-02-04 21:26   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-02-04 21:45     ` Peter Tyser
2009-02-04 23:07     ` Andy Fleming
2009-02-05 16:27       ` Peter Tyser
2009-02-06 13:32         ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-02-06 18:49           ` Andy Fleming
2009-02-06 19:30             ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-02-10  0:56               ` Andy Fleming
2009-02-10 13:59                 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-02-10 17:31                   ` Scott Wood
2009-02-25 20:30                     ` Peter Tyser
2009-02-04 21:49   ` Scott Wood
2009-02-04 21:58     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-02-04 22:00       ` Scott Wood [this message]
2009-02-04 22:19         ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-02-06 13:16       ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-02-06 17:16         ` Ben Warren
2009-07-19 20:14 ` Peter Tyser
2009-08-04 22:50   ` Peter Tyser
2009-08-21 17:04     ` Peter Tyser
2009-08-21 17:35 ` Ben Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=498A100E.4080807@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.