From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xen ocaml tools
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:44:32 +0000
Message-ID: <498B0960.30109@eu.citrix.com>
References: <4989ACA0.40308@eu.citrix.com> <4989FD52.3080401@cs.ubc.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4989FD52.3080401@cs.ubc.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Patrick Colp <pjcolp@cs.ubc.ca>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Thomas Gazagnaire <Thomas.Gazagnaire@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Patrick Colp wrote:
> I'm really excited to see somebody else working on an OCaml XenStore! I 
> was wondering if you could tell me what the difference are between this 
> implementation and the one I recently released to the community?
>   
this is a bit hard to tell without testing your version.

but i think the main difference is the way we handle transactions, which 
should provide a stable average time to commit transactions when having 
lots of xenstore traffic from guests.
> I think it would be great if we could work together to merge our work so 
> we can get the best of both worlds.
>   
yes, it would be nice to not have 2 needlessly "competing" versions.
hopefully we can make that happens at some point.

-- 
Vincent