From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ondrej Valousek Subject: Re: krb5 required when building with sasl support Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:23:54 +0100 Message-ID: <498C2BDA.6070101@s3group.cz> References: <4989C939.7090106@s3group.cz> <498B2F91.1090607@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Cc: autofs mailing list sasl could be (theoretically) built without GSSAPI support and in this case it would not require Kerberos. But the facts are: - sasl support in autofs can not be obviously compiled without gssapi - in these days sasl is many times meant as synonym for sasl/gssapi so it probably does not make any sense not to include gssapi once we include sasl. Ondrej Matthias Koenig wrote: > Guillaume Rousse writes: > > >> More seriously, I think the proper solution would rather be fixing >> underliking in SASL (http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Underlinking). >> > > Hmm, are you really sure, that libsasl depends on kerberos symbols? > In this case you would be right. > I assumed that they're independent from each other and after > a quick grep I couldn't find any krb5_* symbols in libsasl. > At least the lookup_ldap.h header from autofs explicitly includes > the krb5.h header. > > Matthias > > _______________________________________________ > autofs mailing list > autofs@linux.kernel.org > http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs >