From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Goulet Subject: ct_sync project update Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:47:18 -0500 Message-ID: <498C6996.5060004@usherbrooke.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:24728 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751780AbZBFQrX (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:47:23 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.33] ([24.203.248.64]) by VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KEN00J3OLAXAIB0@VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:47:21 -0500 (EST) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi people, For a University Project, I'm trying to take back the ct_sync project and make it work on >= linux kernel 2.6.26. The last patches I found are for linux 2.6.10 and much have changed since then. They are no longer applicable unless major changes. Is there any other group or "hidden svn" that maintain or contain up to date stuff? What's your best advice guys for this project? Is it realistic to take it back or not? Thanks a lot David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkmMaYgACgkQSvfBSxa9hWPZ3QCfb2ahSmRDUlu1wvnr6JOCRt6Z mFoAoL7r5RaplUwOw1+WLYuktzP2N+i+ =LGaK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----