All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: M A Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Tracebacks from dom0 pvops changeset 2342
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:39:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <498F896A.5070505@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902082218060.14840@vega2.dur.ac.uk>

M A Young wrote:
> I have managed to get a dom0 kernel based on pvops changeset 2342 and 
> a Fedora kernel package to boot from a USB linux image, and it 
> finishes eventually, but there are several bug tracebacks on the way. 
> The full dmesg output (gzipped) is attached, but samples are below. 
> Are these useful, and would further information help?
>
>     Michael Young
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2185 
> trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xd1/0x151() (Not tainted)

I see this too, but it doesn't appear to be harmful.  I need to look 
into it to see what's really happening.

>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
> IP: [<(null)>] (null)
> PGD 0
> Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/modalias
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in: intelfb(+) i2c_algo_bit i2c_core wmi video output 
> squashfs vf
> at fat usb_storage sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core firewire_ohci 
> firewire_core crc_itu_
> t ata_generic pata_acpi
> Pid: 12, comm: work_on_cpu/0 Tainted: G        W 
> 2.6.29-0.41.rc2.pvops2342.fc10
> .x86_64 #1
> RIP: e030:[<0000000000000000>]  [<(null)>] (null)
> RSP: e02b:ffff8800de219c68  EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: ffffffff815382e0 RBX: 00000000fffffffa RCX: 0000000000000001
> RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000010000 RDI: 00000000000e0000
> RBP: ffff8800de219cd0 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: ffff8800dbc6c368
> R10: ffff8800de210200 R11: ffff8800dc84ab28 R12: 00000000000e0000
> R13: ffff8800dc470201 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00000000000e0000
> FS:  00007fc7af5fe790(0000) GS:ffff8800090c3000(0000) 
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001001000 CR4: 0000000000002620
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process work_on_cpu/0 (pid: 12, threadinfo ffff8800de218000, task 
> ffff8800de2100
> 00)
> Stack:
>  ffffffff8101f381 ffff8800de219c90 01ffffff8100ebd6 0000000000010000
>  ffff8800dbc6c350 ffff8800de219cb0 ffffffff8119666d 0000000000003001
>  0000000000010000 00000000000e0000 ffff8800dc470201 0000000000000001
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8101f381>] ? mtrr_add_page+0x3a/0x34f
>  [<ffffffff8119666d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x8e/0x93
>  [<ffffffff8101f6d5>] mtrr_add+0x3f/0x4e

I haven't seen this particular one, but I haven't tried using intelfb 
yet.  The mtrr code needs some attention in general.

>  [<ffffffffa008b862>] intelfb_pci_register+0x6d0/0xde9 [intelfb]
>  [<ffffffff8106cd05>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x151
>  [<ffffffff8100dc09>] ? xen_force_evtchn_callback+0xd/0xf
>  [<ffffffff8100e2f2>] ? check_events+0x12/0x20
>  [<ffffffff811a03f3>] local_pci_probe+0x12/0x16
>  [<ffffffff8105a61f>] do_work_for_cpu+0x13/0x1b
>  [<ffffffff8105a815>] run_workqueue+0x13a/0x242
>  [<ffffffff8105a7c1>] ? run_workqueue+0xe6/0x242
>  [<ffffffff8105a60c>] ? do_work_for_cpu+0x0/0x1b
>  [<ffffffff8100e2df>] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1
>  [<ffffffff8138113b>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x128/0x133
>  [<ffffffff8105a9fd>] worker_thread+0xe0/0xf1
>  [<ffffffff8105e6c4>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
>  [<ffffffff8105a91d>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0xf1
>  [<ffffffff8105e34c>] kthread+0x49/0x76
>  [<ffffffff8101322a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
>  [<ffffffff81044800>] ? finish_task_switch+0x49/0x115
>  [<ffffffff8106ce44>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
>  [<ffffffff81012c10>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
>  [<ffffffff81013220>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> Code:  Bad RIP value.
> RIP  [<(null)>] (null)
>  RSP <ffff8800de219c68>
> CR2: 0000000000000000
>
> swap_dup: Bad swap file entry 80000000006ba970
> swap_free: Bad swap file entry 80000000006aeee0
> BUG: Bad page map in process lvm  pte:d5ddc020 pmd:dccbc067

Hm, these should have been fixed by x86-fix-__supported_pte_mask.patch...

Thanks for the reports,
    J

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-09  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-08 22:40 Tracebacks from dom0 pvops changeset 2342 M A Young
2009-02-09  1:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-02-09  8:39   ` M A Young
2009-02-09 18:24     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 18:57       ` M A Young
2009-02-09 19:37         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 21:49           ` M A Young
2009-02-09 22:49             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10  0:45               ` Nakajima, Jun
2009-02-10  1:16                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-12  5:55                   ` Nakajima, Jun
2009-02-20 22:34                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=498F896A.5070505@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=m.a.young@durham.ac.uk \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.