From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ring_buffer: fix ring_buffer_read_page()
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:21:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <498FCB5D.5000304@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
Impact: change API and init bpage when copy
ring_buffer_read_page()/rb_remove_entries() may be called for
a partial consumed page.
Add a parameter for rb_remove_entries(), make it updates
cpu_buffer->entries correctly for partial consumed page.
ring_buffer_read_page() return the offset of events.
init bpage's time_stamp which caller needs when return value is 0.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
ring_buffer.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index e97acae..eaec7e5 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2303,13 +2303,14 @@ int ring_buffer_swap_cpu(struct ring_buffer *buffer_a,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_swap_cpu);
static void rb_remove_entries(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
- struct buffer_data_page *bpage)
+ struct buffer_data_page *bpage,
+ unsigned int offset)
{
struct ring_buffer_event *event;
unsigned long head;
__raw_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
- for (head = 0; head < local_read(&bpage->commit);
+ for (head = offset; head < local_read(&bpage->commit);
head += rb_event_length(event)) {
event = __rb_data_page_index(bpage, head);
@@ -2381,8 +2382,8 @@ void ring_buffer_free_read_page(struct ring_buffer *buffer, void *data)
* if (!rpage)
* return error;
* ret = ring_buffer_read_page(buffer, &rpage, cpu, 0);
- * if (ret)
- * process_page(rpage);
+ * if (ret >= 0)
+ * process_page(rpage, ret);
*
* When @full is set, the function will not return true unless
* the writer is off the reader page.
@@ -2393,8 +2394,8 @@ void ring_buffer_free_read_page(struct ring_buffer *buffer, void *data)
* responsible for that.
*
* Returns:
- * 1 if data has been transferred
- * 0 if no data has been transferred.
+ * >=0 if data has been transferred, returns the offset of consumed data.
+ * <0 if no data has been transferred.
*/
int ring_buffer_read_page(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
void **data_page, int cpu, int full)
@@ -2403,7 +2404,8 @@ int ring_buffer_read_page(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
struct ring_buffer_event *event;
struct buffer_data_page *bpage;
unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
+ unsigned int read;
+ int ret = -1;
if (!data_page)
return 0;
@@ -2425,24 +2427,29 @@ int ring_buffer_read_page(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
/* check for data */
if (!local_read(&cpu_buffer->reader_page->page->commit))
goto out;
+
+ read = cpu_buffer->reader_page->read;
/*
* If the writer is already off of the read page, then simply
* switch the read page with the given page. Otherwise
* we need to copy the data from the reader to the writer.
*/
if (cpu_buffer->reader_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page) {
- unsigned int read = cpu_buffer->reader_page->read;
unsigned int commit = rb_page_commit(cpu_buffer->reader_page);
+ struct buffer_data_page *rpage = cpu_buffer->reader_page->page;
if (full)
goto out;
/* The writer is still on the reader page, we must copy */
- memcpy(bpage->data,
- cpu_buffer->reader_page->page->data + read,
- commit - read);
+ memcpy(bpage->data + read, rpage->data + read, commit - read);
/* consume what was read */
cpu_buffer->reader_page->read = commit;
+
+ /* update bpage */
+ local_set(&bpage->commit, commit);
+ if (!read)
+ bpage->time_stamp = rpage->time_stamp;
} else {
/* swap the pages */
rb_init_page(bpage);
@@ -2451,10 +2458,10 @@ int ring_buffer_read_page(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
cpu_buffer->reader_page->read = 0;
*data_page = bpage;
}
- ret = 1;
+ ret = read;
/* update the entry counter */
- rb_remove_entries(cpu_buffer, bpage);
+ rb_remove_entries(cpu_buffer, bpage, read);
out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
next reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-09 6:21 Lai Jiangshan [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-09 15:17 [PATCH 0/2] git pull request for tip/tracing/urgent Steven Rostedt
2009-02-09 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] ring_buffer: fix ring_buffer_read_page() Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=498FCB5D.5000304@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.