From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?G=E1sp=E1r_Lajos?= <swifty@freemail.hu>
Subject: Re: NAT port forwarding works only for the local net?
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:07:29 +0100
Message-ID: <499038A1.2000600@freemail.hu>
References: <gmo4f1$gsg$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <gmo4f1$gsg$1@ger.gmane.org>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: Ralf <rm@amitrader.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org

Hi Ralf!

Please be more specific...

Ralf =EDrta:
> I made NAT port forwarding rules. It has following effect:
> Packets coming from the local net get forwarded as expected,
> but connects to that port coming from other nets just "hang"
> on the client-side.
Maybe some routing problem here...
>
> I want all packets, regardless of the source IP/net/port,
> coming to that port be forwarded to another machine:port.
> Does iptables port forwarding work only for one source net (the local=
=20
> net) ?
Nope. But can be... :D

Swifty