From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: Is Git Scalable? Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:51:55 -0600 Message-ID: <49905F2B.5030306@freescale.com> References: <21916359.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: agent59624285 X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 09 17:53:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWZO8-0002yy-NY for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:53:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754748AbZBIQwN (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:52:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754697AbZBIQwN (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:52:13 -0500 Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net ([192.88.158.103]:34910 "EHLO az33egw02.freescale.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754611AbZBIQwM (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:52:12 -0500 Received: from az33smr01.freescale.net (az33smr01.freescale.net [10.64.34.199]) by az33egw02.freescale.net (8.14.3/az33egw02) with ESMTP id n19Gq0mn015274; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:52:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mvp-10-214-73-77.am.freescale.net [10.214.73.77]) by az33smr01.freescale.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n19Gpw98008402; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:52:00 -0600 (CST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <21916359.post@talk.nabble.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: agent59624285 wrote: > I'm thinking on use Git in my projects. But I have a doubt I couldn't resolve > in the Git Docs or Wiki. > My organization has really big projects that we split in sub-projects, like > this: > > Big Project > \---> Project A > \---> Project B > \---> Project B1 > \---> Project B2 > \---> Project B3 > \---> Project C > \---> Project C1 > > and so on... > > Now it's possible to work in each "small" project independently (like "git > clone ProjectB3") or you can work with a big project inheriting its > sub-projects (like "git clone ProjectB" that automatically makes a "git > clone ProjectB1", "git clone ProjectB2" and "git clone ProjectB3", putting > each sub-project in the right place). > > The question is: does Git support something like this? > Perhaps "git submodule" ? jdl