From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Tracebacks from dom0 pvops changeset 2342
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:24:47 -0800
Message-ID: <499074EF.7010401@goop.org>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902082218060.14840@vega2.dur.ac.uk>
	<498F896A.5070505@goop.org>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.0902090830290.14781@vega2.dur.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902090830290.14781@vega2.dur.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: M A Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

M A Young wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> Hm, these should have been fixed by 
>> x86-fix-__supported_pte_mask.patch...
>
> It looks like that patch was commented out of the series file in 2342 
> so I didn't apply it. Does that mean it is included somewhere else 
> (the kernel I started from was essentially 2.6.29-rc2), or has it gone 
> missing by mistake? 

Well, it has been accepted upstream, so I think the x86.patch should 
already contain that change.  Its possible you're seeing a separate bug 
with the same symptoms, which would be unfortunate.

    J