All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [cgroup or VFS ?] INFO: possible recursive locking detected
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:19:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49910E55.7050905@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090210043733.GY28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:06:39AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> 
>> BTW, I found another bug in current code:
> 
> Why is that a bug?  If _anything_ had been trying to acquire the
> rwsem in question, it would be fscked anyway.  Not to mention
> that nothing could have ever seen that struct super_block in this
> particular case, as a general rule
> 	* if something might be blocked on your mutex/rwsem or spinning
> on a spinlock, releasing it before you free the object won't save your
> arse.
> 	You have no promise whatsoever that whoever's been trying to
> get the lock in question will even get out of the locking primitive
> before the memory that contains the lock gets freed.  In case of superblocks
> in general, you don't free them until ->s_count hits zero.  At that point
> anything as much as remembering the address of that superblock is already
> FUBAR.
> 

This is not the general case. This sb won't be seen by anyone, and destroy_super()
is called on a sb with ->s_count == 1 and ->s_umount held.

Actually I ran into this after Peter's patch applied:

=========================
[ BUG: held lock freed! ]
-------------------------
mount/13413 is freeing memory e767a800-e767abff, with a lock still held there!
 (&type->s_umount_key#29/1){--..}, at: [<c04a4104>] sget+0x1ea/0x324
2 locks held by mount/13413:
 #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#29/1){--..}, at: [<c04a4104>] sget+0x1ea/0x324
 #1:  (&type->s_umount_key#30){--..}, at: [<c04a3f72>] sget+0x58/0x324

stack backtrace:
Pid: 13413, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.29-rc4 #548
Call Trace:
 [<c044d865>] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0xc9/0x105
 [<c049c86d>] kfree+0x82/0xd1
 [<c04a41e0>] ? sget+0x2c6/0x324
 [<c04a41e0>] sget+0x2c6/0x324
 [<c045dda9>] ? cgroup_set_super+0x0/0x3e
 [<c045cf6f>] ? cgroup_test_super+0x0/0x2f
 [<c045f840>] cgroup_get_sb+0x8d/0x284
 [<c0489216>] ? kstrdup+0x31/0x53
 [<c04a46aa>] vfs_kern_mount+0x40/0x7b
 [<c04a4733>] do_kern_mount+0x37/0xbf
 [<c04b5dc6>] do_mount+0x5c4/0x61b
 [<c04b477a>] ? copy_mount_options+0x2c/0x111
 [<c04b5e86>] sys_mount+0x69/0xa0
 [<c0403351>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-10  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-05  3:23 [cgroup or VFS ?] INFO: possible recursive locking detected Li Zefan
2009-01-08  3:45 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-09 11:23   ` Al Viro
2009-02-09 11:38     ` Li Zefan
2009-02-09 11:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-10  3:06       ` Li Zefan
2009-02-10  4:37         ` Al Viro
2009-02-10  5:19           ` Li Zefan [this message]
2009-02-10  6:07             ` Al Viro
2009-02-10  9:25               ` Li Zefan
2009-02-12  6:14                 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-10  8:32         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49910E55.7050905@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.