All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: yoann.juet@univ-nantes.fr
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Second failover failure with conntrackd - INVALID packets
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:49:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49929106.8080006@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49917D90.8090706@univ-nantes.fr>

Yoann Juet wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>> As you can see, this TCP connection is present:
>>>
>>> root@fw1-irt:~# conntrack -L  |grep 34189
>>> conntrack v0.9.10 (conntrack-tools): 14 flow entries has been shown.
>>> tcp      6 10581 ESTABLISHED src=172.18.244.10 dst=193.52.101.32
>>> sport=34189 dport=5222 packets=63 bytes=12039 src=193.52.101.32
>>> dst=172.18.244.10 sport=5222 dport=34189 packets=58 bytes=22146
>>> [ASSURED] mark=0 secmark=0 use=1
>>
>> This is weird, look like some problem in your scripts or the commit is
>> not working in node fw1-irt. The packet counters of the entry above show
>> that this is the old entry which is stuck in the cache after the second
>> failover. This should be deleted when fw1-irt's script issues the commit
>> (conntrackd -c). Does the log file tells that the commit was successful?
>>
> 
> I confirm that "conntrackd -c" is executed on FW1-IRT on the second
> failover. FYI, my LSB script executes the following instructions (start=
> new active node ; stop = new passive node):
> 
> ...
> case "$1" in
>         start)
>                 conntrackd -c -C /etc/conntrackd.conf
>                 conntrackd -f -C /etc/conntrackd.conf
>                 conntrackd -R -C /etc/conntrackd.conf
>                 exit 0
>                 ;;
> 
>         stop)
>                 #conntrackd -t -C /etc/conntrackd.conf
>                 conntrackd -n -C /etc/conntrackd.conf
>                 exit 0
>                 ;;

Before the second failover, does conntrackd -e in FW1-IRT (now in backup
mode) show, at least, one entry that talks about the TCP connection that
is in trouble? I think that it will not show any (but it should show
one, so I think that I have found the problem ;). Please, confirm this
and I'll get back to you with a possible solution soon.

BTW, why your script does not invoke the '-t', did you notice any
problem? That schedules the cleanup of the kernel conntrack table after
PurgeTimeout seconds when a node enters backup mode.

Thanks for your patience.

-- 
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-11  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-21 17:52 Second failover failure with conntrackd - INVALID packets Yoann Juet
2009-01-21 20:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-01-22  9:54   ` Yoann Juet
2009-01-22 16:55     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-01-23 12:39       ` Yoann Juet
2009-01-25 10:51         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-01-25 17:55           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-01-26 19:27             ` Yoann Juet
2009-01-26 23:01               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-01-29 16:10                 ` Yoann Juet
2009-02-03 10:10                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-02-04 10:37                     ` Yoann Juet
2009-02-04 10:43                       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-02-06  9:18                         ` Yoann Juet
2009-02-09 11:29                           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-02-10 13:13                             ` Yoann Juet
2009-02-11  8:49                               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2009-02-13  8:21                                 ` Yoann Juet
2009-02-13 15:20                                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
     [not found]                                     ` <499B0696.2020300@netfilter.org>
2009-02-23 15:38                                       ` Yoann Juet
2009-02-23 20:40                                         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-02-24 12:03                                           ` Yoann Juet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49929106.8080006@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoann.juet@univ-nantes.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.