From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Eric Kidd <git@randomhacks.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-filter-branch: Add more error-handling
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:58:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4992E79D.10208@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234361365-63711-1-git-send-email-git@randomhacks.net>
Eric Kidd schrieb:
> In particular, the following hunk may change the public UI to
> git-filter-branch, although I'm not sure whether the change is for
> better or for worse. As I understand it, this hunk would allow
> $filter_commit to abort the rewriting process by returning a non-0 exit
> status:
>
> @SHELL_PATH@ -c "$filter_commit" "git commit-tree" \
> - $(git write-tree) $parentstr < ../message > ../map/$commit
> + $(git write-tree) $parentstr < ../message > ../map/$commit ||
> + die "could not write rewritten commit"
> done <../revs
>
> I'd be happy to add a test case for what happens when $filter_commit
> returns a non-0 exit status. Is the old behavior preferable?
I think it's OK to die if the commit filter fails.
But generally, I think it is not necessary to use 'die with error
message', a plain '|| exit' should be enough because an error will have
been reported already by the tool that failed.
> @@ -483,7 +486,7 @@ test -z "$ORIG_GIT_INDEX_FILE" || {
> }
>
> if [ "$(is_bare_repository)" = false ]; then
> - git read-tree -u -m HEAD
> + git read-tree -u -m HEAD || die "Unable to checkout rewritten tree"
Here you shouldn't die. But unlike elsewhere, this case warrants an
explanation for the user:
git read-tree -u -m HEAD ||
echo >&2 "WARNING: The working directory is not up-to-date!"
> fi
>
> exit $ret
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-11 14:09 [PATCH] git-filter-branch: Add more error-handling Eric Kidd
2009-02-11 14:58 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2009-02-11 15:36 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-02-11 15:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-11 17:15 ` [PATCH v2] filter-branch: " Eric Kidd
2009-02-11 19:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-11 19:34 ` Eric Kidd
2009-02-11 20:03 ` [PATCHv3] " Eric Kidd
2009-02-11 20:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-11 21:00 ` Eric Kidd
2009-02-11 21:10 ` [PATCHv4] " Eric Kidd
2009-02-11 21:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Nanako Shiraishi
2009-02-11 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4992E79D.10208@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=git@randomhacks.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.