From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Machine description as data Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:11:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4994D6C8.5050004@gmx.net> References: <87iqnh6kyv.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <1234378228.28751.79.camel@slate.austin.ibm.com> <20090212040138.GD31142@yookeroo.seuss> <87iqng0x3t.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <20090213004305.GB8104@yookeroo.seuss> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090213004305.GB8104-787xzQ0H9iRg7VrjXcPTGA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org To: Markus Armbruster , Hollis Blanchard , devicetree-discuss-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 13.02.2009 01:43, David Gibson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> I didn't mean to say they are a bad idea for FDTs, just that they're on >> an awkward level of abstraction for QEMU configuration. There, I'd >> rather express a PCI address as "02:01.0" than as <0x00000220>. >> Translating text to binary is the machine's job, not the user's. >> > > Ah, I see what you mean. Hrm, there are several possibilities here, > we'll have to see which works out best for your purposes. > Using the DTC version included in the coreboot v3 sources would solve that problem and give you a readable PCI address representation. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/