Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add deprecation notice for sched changes

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

13/05/2019 15:59, Singh, Jasvinder:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > 29/04/2019 12:31, Mohammad Abdul Awal:
> > > On 24/04/2019 13:37, Jasvinder Singh wrote:
> > > > Add deprecation note for making changes in data structures, APIs and
> > > > macros in order to have more traffic classes, flexible mapping of
> > > > pipe queues to traffic classes, subport level configuration of pipes
> > > > and queues, etc. These changes are aligned to improvements suggested
> > > > in the RFC-
> > > > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-November/120035.html
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > > > +* sched: To allow more traffic classes, flexible mapping of pipe
> > > > +queues to
> > > > +  traffic classes, and subport level configuration of pipes and
> > > > +queues
> > > > +  changes will be made to macros, data structures and API functions
> > > > +defined
> > > > +  in "rte_sched.h". These changes are aligned to improvements
> > > > +suggested in the
> > > > +  RFC https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-November/120035.html.
> > 
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mohammad Abdul Awal <mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com>
> > Acked-by : Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
> > 
> > There are only 2 acks for this change.
> > Any other opinion? yes or no?
> > 
> 
> Cristian has provided his ack as well,  please see below signed-off line.

You are right.
So we get enough acks from the whole team :)

If nobody is against, I will merge it.