From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4 not currently doing (much) multi-block allocation?
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:37:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49986EEA.1020405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090215173629.GF22585@skywalker>
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 08:36:18AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 04:35:28PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> Here is how it works. During writepages we loop through the dirty pages
>>> and build largest contiguous block extent (mpage_add_bh_to_extent). Then we call
>>> mpage_da_map_blocks. mpage_da_map_blocks does the mutli block request.
>>> Once we have the blocks allocated we map these blocks to the pages. And
>>> then we writeback one page at a time using writepage callback.
>> mpage_da_map_blocks() calls mpd->get_block, which is set to
>> ext4_da_get_block_write(), which allocates a single block at a time
>> (max_blocks is set to bh->b_size >> inode->i_blkbits).
>
>
> That bh>b_size indicate multiple blocks.
I never did like this overloading of a buffer head for this sort of
purpose, for this (sometimes confusing) reason, but it's done throughout
the kernel... :)
But, maybe a comment would be in order just to make it clear "This is a
mapping BH" or something.
-Eric
> we do the below in mpage_add_bh_to_extent
>
> 2024 if (logical == next && (bh->b_state & BH_FLAGS) == lbh->b_state) {
> 2025 lbh->b_size += b_size;
> 2026 return;
> 2027 }
>
>> Put another way, where is the call to ext4_get_blocks_wrap() which
>> does the multi-block request? I don't see it...
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-15 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 5:32 ext4 not currently doing (much) multi-block allocation? Theodore Tso
2009-02-15 11:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-15 13:36 ` Theodore Tso
2009-02-15 17:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-15 19:37 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-02-15 21:12 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49986EEA.1020405@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.