From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Zefan Subject: Re: [cgroup or VFS ?] WARNING: at fs/namespace.c:636 mntput_no_expire+0xac/0xf2() Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:47:02 +0800 Message-ID: <4998D3A6.9010406@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4993C2A0.3050507@cn.fujitsu.com> <4993C7C2.4060100@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090212070729.GF28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4995007D.7040101@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090213054751.GI28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <49950F3D.3030704@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090213064135.GJ28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20090213071816.GK28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4995208D.8050700@cn.fujitsu.com> <4998C15C.2070203@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090216023812.GT28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090216023812.GT28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Cc: containers@lists.osdl.org, LKML , Paul Menage , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , gregkh@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, Linus Torvalds List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org > OK... So here's what we really want: > * we know that nobody will set cpu_writer->mnt to mnt from now on > * all changes to that sucker are done under cpu_writer->lock > * we want the laziest equivalent of > spin_lock(&cpu_writer->lock); > if (likely(cpu_writer->mnt != mnt)) { > spin_unlock(&cpu_writer->lock); > continue; > } > /* do stuff */ > that would make sure we won't miss earlier setting of ->mnt done by another > CPU. > If this is done, I'll be available to test it. > Anyway, for now (HEAD and all -stable starting with 2.6.26) we want this: > And here is my: Tested-by: Li Zefan > --- fs/namespace.c 2009-01-25 21:45:31.000000000 -0500 > +++ fs/namespace.c 2009-02-15 21:31:14.000000000 -0500 > @@ -614,9 +614,11 @@ > */ > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > struct mnt_writer *cpu_writer = &per_cpu(mnt_writers, cpu); > - if (cpu_writer->mnt != mnt) > - continue; > spin_lock(&cpu_writer->lock); > + if (cpu_writer->mnt != mnt) { > + spin_unlock(&cpu_writer->lock); > + continue; > + } > atomic_add(cpu_writer->count, &mnt->__mnt_writers); > cpu_writer->count = 0; > /*