From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Netfilter API and libiptc Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:08:01 +0100 Message-ID: <49997341.1060907@trash.net> References: <20090205141722.GB21417@qubit> <4990636B.9080900@trash.net> <20090209183941.GA1050@zenon.in.qult.net> <4992E2B3.3030009@trash.net> <4993AFF9.9010002@trash.net> <4993BA81.8030404@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Ignacy Gawedzki , Netfilter Developers To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:59061 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757858AbZBPOIF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:08:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > >> Hi Patrick, >> >> Would you please consider the libiptc shared library patch for inclusion? >> I don't find the patch intrusive. I have tested it and it works. >> >> See patch below... > > Ups, that patch would not apply cleanly to the latest git (commit > 5dd19de34380). Trivial diff conflict on Makefile.am (due to ae19604f > "build: remove unneeded -ldl from iptables_xml_LDADD") > > There is a clean version: > >> From 4a1c3f3e56a2039b87636d3d2d8517933c47b517 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jan Engelhardt > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:40:29 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] libiptc: make library available as a shared library No objections from my side. Jan, do you consider this patch ready for inclusion?