From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amos Jeffries Subject: Re: (nfnl_talk: recvmsg over-run) and (nf_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping packets(s). Dropped: 582) - bug or just some defaults increase required? Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:48:19 +1300 Message-ID: <499B76F3.1090901@treenet.co.nz> References: <4996FBBE.20009@netfilter.org> <200902161819.27630.anton.vazir@gmail.com> <49996D49.9050606@netfilter.org> <49998504.9020004@netfilter.org> <499AF0B8.5060202@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel To: Anton VG Return-path: Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233]:40698 "EHLO treenet.co.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752048AbZBRCsI (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:48:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anton VG wrote: > Pablo, > > Thanks so much for patch, will test it shortly, > > Do you have any suggestion what method to use if not select() ? > > Since we have to handle potentially thousands of queues on the single PC? > > Sincerely, > Anton. epoll and in where available kqueue seems to be faster and non-blocking than select(). AYJ