All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
To: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	"Vitaly V. Bursov" <vitalyb@telenet.dn.ua>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow file transfer speeds with CFQ IO scheduler in some cases
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:14:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <499C4FF4.6000006@vlnb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499B09FB.1070909@vlnb.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4161 bytes --]

Vladislav Bolkhovitin, on 02/17/2009 10:03 PM wrote:
> Wu Fengguang, on 02/16/2009 05:34 AM wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:08:25PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>>> Wu Fengguang, on 02/13/2009 04:57 AM wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:35:18PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>>>>> Sorry for such a huge delay. There were many other activities I had 
>>>>> to  do before + I had to be sure I didn't miss anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> We didn't use NFS, we used SCST (http://scst.sourceforge.net) with   
>>>>> iSCSI-SCST target driver. It has similar to NFS architecture, where N 
>>>>>  threads (N=5 in this case) handle IO from remote initiators 
>>>>> (clients)  coming from wire using iSCSI protocol. In addition, SCST 
>>>>> has patch  called export_alloc_io_context (see   
>>>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/10/282), which allows for the IO threads 
>>>>>  queue IO using single IO context, so we can see if context RA can   
>>>>> replace grouping IO threads in single IO context.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, the results are negative. We find neither any 
>>>>> advantages  of context RA over current RA implementation, nor 
>>>>> possibility for  context RA to replace grouping IO threads in single 
>>>>> IO context.
>>>>>
>>>>> Setup on the target (server) was the following. 2 SATA drives grouped 
>>>>> in  md RAID-0 with average local read throughput ~120MB/s ("dd 
>>>>> if=/dev/zero  of=/dev/md0 bs=1M count=20000" outputs "20971520000 
>>>>> bytes (21 GB)  copied, 177,742 s, 118 MB/s"). The md device was 
>>>>> partitioned on 3  partitions. The first partition was 10% of space in 
>>>>> the beginning of the  device, the last partition was 10% of space in 
>>>>> the end of the device,  the middle one was the rest in the middle of 
>>>>> the space them. Then the  first and the last partitions were exported 
>>>>> to the initiator (client).  They were /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc on it 
>>>>> correspondingly.
>>>> Vladislav, Thank you for the benchmarks! I'm very interested in
>>>> optimizing your workload and figuring out what happens underneath.
>>>>
>>>> Are the client and server two standalone boxes connected by GBE?
>>> Yes, they directly connected using GbE.
>>>
>>>> When you set readahead sizes in the benchmarks, you are setting them
>>>> in the server side? I.e. "linux-4dtq" is the SCST server?
>>> Yes, it's the server. On the client all the parameters were left default.
>>>
>>>> What's the
>>>> client side readahead size?
>>> Default, i.e. 128K
>>>
>>>> It would help a lot to debug readahead if you can provide the
>>>> server side readahead stats and trace log for the worst case.
>>>> This will automatically answer the above questions as well as disclose
>>>> the micro-behavior of readahead:
>>>>
>>>>         mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug
>>>>
>>>>         echo > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/stats # reset counters
>>>>         # do benchmark
>>>>         cat /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/stats
>>>>
>>>>         echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/trace_enable
>>>>         # do micro-benchmark, i.e. run the same benchmark for a short time
>>>>         echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/trace_enable
>>>>         dmesg
>>>>
>>>> The above readahead trace should help find out how the client side
>>>> sequential reads convert into server side random reads, and how we can
>>>> prevent that.
>>> We will do it as soon as we have a free window on that system.
>> Thank you. For NFS, the client side read/readahead requests will be
>> split into units of rsize which will be served by a pool of nfsd
>> concurrently and possibly out of order. Does SCST have the same
>> process? If so, what's the rsize value for your SCST benchmarks?
> 
> No, there is no such splitting in SCST. Client sees raw SCSI disks from 
> server and what client sends is directly and in full size sent by the 
> server to its backstorage using regular buffered read() 
> (fd->f_op->aio_read() followed by 
> wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb()/wait_on_sync_kiocb() to be precise).

Update. We ran the same tests with deadline I/O scheduler and had 
roughly the same results as with CFQ, see attachment.

> Thanks,
> Vlad
> 
> 


[-- Attachment #2: 2.6.27.12-except_export+readahead-4M-deadline.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2395 bytes --]

linux-4dtq:~ # uname -r
2.6.27.12-except_export+readahead
-scheduler = deadline
- RA = 4M


linux-4dtq:~ # free
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        508168     111288     396880          0       4476      62648
-/+ buffers/cache:      44164     464004
Swap:            0          0          0


linux-4dtq:~ # echo deadline > /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler
linux-4dtq:~ # echo deadline > /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
linux-4dtq:~ # cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler
noop anticipatory [deadline] cfq
linux-4dtq:~ # cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
noop anticipatory [deadline] cfq

linux-4dtq:~ # echo 1 > /sys/block/sda/queue/context_readahead
linux-4dtq:~ # echo 1 > /sys/block/sdb/queue/context_readahead
linux-4dtq:~ # cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/context_readahead
1
linux-4dtq:~ # cat /sys/block/sda/queue/context_readahead
1

linux-4dtq:~ # blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/sda
linux-4dtq:~ # blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/sdb
linux-4dtq:~ # blockdev --getra /dev/sdb
4096
linux-4dtq:~ # blockdev --getra /dev/sda
4096

linux-4dtq:~ # mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sd[ab]
mdadm: /dev/md/0 has been started with 2 drives.
linux-4dtq:~ # vgchange -a y
  3 logical volume(s) in volume group "raid" now active
linux-4dtq:~ # lvs
  LV   VG   Attr   LSize   Origin Snap%  Move Log Copy%  Convert
  1st  raid -wi-a-  46.00G
  2nd  raid -wi-a- 374.00G
  3rd  raid -wi-a-  46.00G

scst: Using security group "Default" for initiator "iqn.1996-04.de.suse:01:aadab8bc4be5"
iscsi-scst:		Negotiated parameters: InitialR2T No, ImmediateData Yes, MaxConnections 1, MaxRecvDataSegmentLength 262144, MaxXmitDataSegmentLength 131072,
iscsi-scst:     MaxBurstLength 1048576, FirstBurstLength 262144, DefaultTime2Wait 2, DefaultTime2Retain 0,
iscsi-scst:     MaxOutstandingR2T 1, DataPDUInOrder Yes, DataSequenceInOrder Yes, ErrorRecoveryLevel 0,
iscsi-scst:     HeaderDigest None, DataDigest None, OFMarker No, IFMarker No, OFMarkInt 2048, IFMarkInt 2048

1) dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=64K count=80000
a) 54,1 MB/s
b) 55,6 MB/s
c) 54,3 MB/s

2) dd if=/dev/sdc of=/dev/null bs=64K count=80000
a) 71,3 MB/s
b) 73,8 MB/s
c) 72,7 MB/s

3)Run at the same time:	
while true; do dd if=/dev/sdc  of=/dev/null bs=64K; done	
dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=64K count=80000
a) 4,3 MB/s
b) 5.0 MB/s 
c) 5.2 MB/s

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-18 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-09 18:04 Slow file transfer speeds with CFQ IO scheduler in some cases Vitaly V. Bursov
2008-11-09 18:30 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-11-09 18:32   ` Vitaly V. Bursov
2008-11-10 10:44 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-10 13:51   ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-10 13:56     ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-10 17:16       ` Vitaly V. Bursov
2008-11-10 17:35         ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-10 18:27           ` Vitaly V. Bursov
2008-11-10 18:29             ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-10 18:39               ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-10 18:42               ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-10 21:51             ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-11  9:34               ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-11  9:35                 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-11 11:52                   ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-11 16:48                     ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-11 18:08                       ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-11 16:53                     ` Vitaly V. Bursov
2008-11-11 18:06                       ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-11 19:36                         ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-11 21:41                           ` Jeff Layton
2008-11-11 21:59                             ` Jeff Layton
2008-11-12 12:20                               ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-12 12:45                                 ` Jeff Layton
2008-11-12 12:54                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-11-11 19:42                         ` Vitaly V. Bursov
2008-11-12 18:32       ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-12 19:02         ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-13  8:51           ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-13  8:54             ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-14  1:36               ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-25 11:02                 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-11-25 11:25                   ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-25 15:21                   ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-25 16:17                     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-11-13 18:46             ` Vitaly V. Bursov
2008-11-25 10:59             ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-11-25 11:30               ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-25 11:41                 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-11-25 11:49                   ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-25 12:03                     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-11-25 12:09                       ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-11-25 12:15                         ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-27 17:46                           ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
     [not found]                             ` <492EDCFB.7080302-d+Crzxg7Rs0@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-28  0:48                               ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-28  0:48                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-02-12 18:35                                 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-02-13  1:57                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-02-13 20:08                                     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-02-13 20:08                                       ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
     [not found]                                       ` <4995D339.5050502-d+Crzxg7Rs0@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-16  2:34                                         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-02-16  2:34                                           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-02-17 19:03                                           ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-02-17 19:03                                             ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-02-18 18:14                                             ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin [this message]
2009-02-19  1:35                                             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-02-17 19:01                                     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-02-17 19:01                                       ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-02-19  2:05                                       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-19 17:44                                         ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-03-20  8:53                                           ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-03-23  1:42                                           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-04-21 18:18                                             ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-04-24  8:43                                               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-12 18:13                                                 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
     [not found]                                   ` <49946BE6.1040005-d+Crzxg7Rs0@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-17 19:01                                     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-02-17 19:01                                       ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
     [not found]                                       ` <499B0979.8050006-d+Crzxg7Rs0@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-19  1:38                                         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-02-19  1:38                                           ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-24 15:33           ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-24 18:13             ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-24 18:50               ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-24 18:51                 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-13  6:54         ` Vitaly V. Bursov
2008-11-13 14:32           ` Jeff Moyer
2008-11-13 18:33             ` Vitaly V. Bursov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=499C4FF4.6000006@vlnb.net \
    --to=vst@vlnb.net \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vitalyb@telenet.dn.ua \
    --cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.