Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce the function strip_path_suffix()

[Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>]

Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> The function strip_path_suffix() will try to split the given path into
> prefix/suffix.  The suffix has to be passed to the function, and if the
> path matches, the prefix is set.
> 
> Arbitrary runs of directory separators ("slashes") are assumed identical.
> 
> Example:
> 
> 	strip_path_suffix("C:\\msysgit/\\libexec\\git-core",
> 		"libexec///git-core", &prefix)
> 
> will set prefix to "C:\\msysgit" and return 0.

But you implemented it so that prefix is actually "C:\\msysgit/\\" 
(unless, of course, I'm reading the code wrong).

> +/* sets prefix if the suffix matches */
> +int strip_path_suffix(const char *path, const char *suffix, const char **prefix)

For a general purpose function, the API is very unnatural (and geared 
towards its only user in patch 2/2). I'd expect that the return value is 
the result or NULL on failure.

I would not raise this concern if this were a static function near its 
only call site.

> +{
> +	int path_len = strlen(path), suffix_len = strlen(suffix);
> +
> +	while (suffix_len) {
> +		if (!path_len)
> +			return 1;
> +
> +		if (is_dir_sep(path[path_len - 1])) {
> +			if (!is_dir_sep(suffix[suffix_len - 1]))
> +				return 1;
> +			path_len = chomp_trailing_dir_sep(path, path_len);
> +			suffix_len = chomp_trailing_dir_sep(suffix, suffix_len);
> +		}
> +		else if (path[--path_len] != suffix[--suffix_len])
> +			return 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (path_len && !is_dir_sep(path[path_len - 1]))
> +		return 1;

Should strip_path_suffix("foo/bar", "foo/bar", &prefix) succeed and 
prefix be the empty string? This implementation says it should be so. 
That's just a question...

> +	*prefix = xstrndup(path, chomp_trailing_dir_sep(path, path_len));
> +	return 0;
> +}

-- Hannes