From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Re: pv_ops parport trouble
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:08:28 -0800
Message-ID: <499D920C.2020705@goop.org>
References: <C5C33E77.3163%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5C33E77.3163%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Keir Fraser wrote:
> Comparing with a non-pv_ops dom0 on that same system would be an obvious
> next step.

Yeah, that was it.  I was passing the ACPI triggering value directly to 
the APIC, but they have reversed senses.  Seems to have fixed the AHCI 
problem for both Gerd and me.

    J