From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756152AbZBTN7U (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:59:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751247AbZBTN7K (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:59:10 -0500 Received: from mbox2.netikka.net ([213.250.81.203]:47531 "EHLO mbox2.netikka.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751150AbZBTN7J (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:59:09 -0500 Message-ID: <499EB6B0.6040703@mandriva.org> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:57:04 +0200 From: Thomas Backlund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Thomas Backlund , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" , Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , Willy Tarreau , Rodrigo Rubira Branco , Jake Edge , Eugene Teo , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [patch 03/36] Fix Intel IOMMU write-buffer flushing References: <20090218222447.432108614@mini.kroah.org> <20090218222901.GD10668@kroah.com> <499C9394.5030704@mandriva.org> <499DF274.8040702@mandriva.org> <20090220033559.GA32562@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20090220033559.GA32562@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH skrev: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:59:48AM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote: >> Thomas Backlund skrev: >>> This patch is broken compared to what's in: >>> http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=ca77fde8e62cecb2c0769052228d15b901367af8 >>> attached patch fixes it >> As no-one responded yet... > > Sorry for the delay, you're right, I messed this one up. I'll merge > your fix into the patch before doing the release tomorrow. > OK, Thanks. > Thanks for letting us know. > No problem.... I see you have the same patch & bug in the 2.6.28.7-rc1, so it needs the same fix... The patch I already sent will apply with fuzz, but is applied correctly -- Thomas