From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zan Lynx Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-02-10-16-35 uploaded (reiser4-quota) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:12:31 -0700 Message-ID: <499EF28F.4080508@acm.org> References: <499305AD.4020900@oracle.com> <20090211171324.GC13817@duck.suse.cz> <20090212114737.C8EA.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090211185321.138bb93a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090211185321.138bb93a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Andrew Morton Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Jan Kara , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS Mailing List Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:49:20 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > >> Andrew, recently I've never seen any reiser4 activity in LKML. >> I would suggest to remove it from -mm. > > A handful of people use it, and the cost of carrying it is pretty low. > > Hey, at least it handles ENOSPC without going BUG(). I use it and love it and I think its code belongs in the kernel far more than ext4 ever did when ext4 was first added. By the way, I have been waiting for a new -mm release. :-) Are there going to be any more -mm releases or are we supposed to use mmotm only now? -- Zan Lynx zlynx@acm.org "Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. Study Hard. Be Evil."