All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: etienne <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, paul.moore@hp.com,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][SMACK] convert smack rule list to linux list
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:18:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A16CBB.5060600@numericable.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902222231.BDI18760.JFFLOQHMFOOSVt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> etienne wrote:
>> what's the best way, using a rcu variant for "list_for_each, container_of ...etc" ?
>> (concurrent list insertion are already protected with a mutex, so rcu must the good idea for the read side) 
> Read side will need a read lock.
> I think you need to change from "mutex" to "rw_semaphore" (on the assumption
> that SMACK is safe against read locks that may sleep.  If not, change from
> "mutex" to "rw_spinlock").
> 
> Regards.
> 
or a rcu_read_lock?
since it disables preemption it means no user process will be able to change the list while it's read?

regards,
Etienne

 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-22 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-22 11:59 [PATCH][SMACK] convert smack rule list to linux list etienne
2009-02-22 11:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2009-02-22 13:13   ` Tetsuo Handa
2009-02-22 15:28     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-22 13:14   ` etienne
2009-02-22 13:31     ` Tetsuo Handa
2009-02-22 15:18       ` etienne [this message]
2009-02-22 15:31     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-22 17:54       ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-22 18:25         ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found] <fa.JI7eCUCI0gjfyTdUdhIf4ZvZn1Q@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.VIgNcVDTCE/wNXrAutvWzCWynf0@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.JLh+cst3ii911Hjql2Um0CktNnM@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.C6JdJ3BhdOO3tiGIAv+XuVpBjBk@ifi.uio.no>
2009-02-22 16:30       ` etienne
2009-02-22 18:24         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A16CBB.5060600@numericable.fr \
    --to=etienne.basset@numericable.fr \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.