From: Nic Henke <nic@cray.com>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] moving obd_fail_check to libcfs
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:15:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A18841.7030200@cray.com> (raw)
Would there be any objection to a patch that'd move the current
obdclass-centric obd_fail_check and friends to libcfs ? I'd like to be
able to use the same logic inside LNET and our new LND without
replicating the code.
I'm thinking it would need to be renamed to CFS_FAIL_CHECK as well.
Thoughts or suggestions?
Nic
next reply other threads:[~2009-02-22 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-22 17:15 Nic Henke [this message]
2009-02-23 8:11 ` [Lustre-devel] moving obd_fail_check to libcfs Robert Read
2009-02-23 21:39 ` Eric Barton
2009-02-23 22:50 ` di wang
2009-02-23 23:53 ` Nicholas Henke
2009-02-24 1:04 ` di wang
2009-02-23 14:56 ` Eric Barton
2009-03-09 20:26 ` Nicholas Henke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A18841.7030200@cray.com \
--to=nic@cray.com \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.