From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] conntrack-tools 0.9.11 released Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:55:10 +0100 Message-ID: <49A3C3FE.2000403@netfilter.org> References: <49A03C73.8010004@netfilter.org> <20090222233433.0dc8f396@liberty.rlwhome.lan> <49A26A3E.5020707@netfilter.org> <20090223093416.2c63fc02@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090223093416.2c63fc02@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Robby Workman Cc: Jan Engelhardt , netfilter@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Robby Workman wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:19:58 +0100 > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >> Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> On Monday 2009-02-23 06:34, Robby Workman wrote: >>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:40:03 +0100 >>>> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>>> >>>>> The netfilter project presents another development release of the >>>>> conntrack-tools... >>>> I thought I recalled seeing discussion about this already, but I >>>> don't see it in my archives, so maybe not. With glibc-2.7, this >>>> release builds fine; however, with glibc-2.9, both src/mcast.c and >>>> src/sync-mode.c need limits.h included, or else INT_MAX is >>>> undefined. >>> This builds fine for me - and I am on glibc 2.9. >>> Just *what* is it in (which distro? Debian/Ubuntu again?) >>> again to constantly fail on INT_MAX? >> Indeed. This also compiles fine for me in debian. I have committed a >> patch for this [1]. This issue is unfortunate. Gentoo bugzilla on >> conntrack-tools had a patch but nobody has sent it to me. I notice it >> after the release. >> >> [1] >> http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=conntrack-tools.git;a=commit;h=9bf002ff7935e7dff625683787fc3a06ac2ef2cb > > > Weird that it's not affecting Jan then, because it's definitely > something specific to newer glibc (or perhaps gcc, but it's not > immediately obvious how that would be the case). I'm on Slackware > rather than Gentoo, running quite a bit of prerelease development > builds (including gcc-4.3.3 and glibc-2.9 along with 2.6.28.7 kernel). I'm don't mind too much as long as the following patch (which is already in git to fix the gentoo's problem) fixes also yours: http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=conntrack-tools.git;a=commitdiff;h=9bf002ff7935e7dff625683787fc3a06ac2ef2cb;hp=87c8c090e1b64eac27edb968845cb1e8ee65b06b Please, confirm that the problem is resolved. -- "Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers