All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: strange hdparm results with serverworks and pata-serverworks
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:29:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A3F63A.2080805@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A30901.1@wpkg.org>

Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> I have a ProLiant BL30p G1 machine running Debian Lenny (2.6.26 kernel).
> 
> It also has two identical, 2.5 inch WDC WD2500BEVE-00WZT0 IDE drives 
> (new drives, no smart/badblock errors). Both drives are connected to a 
> single IDE channel this machine has.
> 
> "hdparm -t" gives me different results for these drives: ~10 MB/s for 
> hda, and ~20 MB/s for hdb with "serverworks" driver on Debian's 2.6.26 
> kernel.
> When using "pata-serverworks" with 2.6.28.7 kernel, hdparm shows the 
> same results (~10 MB/s for sda, ~20 MB/s for sdb).
> 
> 
> However, when I run "dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=64k", I can see with 
> iostat that for the first 7-8 seconds, reads are with ~10 MB/s speed. 
> Then, reads from sda are with ~20 MB/s or more and are on par with sdb.
> 
> Similar dd test for sdb shows that it delivers with speed of ~20 MB/s 
> from the first second.
> 
> Is there an explanation for that?
..

Well, as you have shown, both hdparm and dd give the same results
when doing (almost) the same test:  the first 3 seconds are slow.

After that, I would assume that the kernel read-ahead algorithms
kick in better and improve things.

But 10-20Mbytes/sec is slow for most modern drives,
even for 2.5" drives.  Older ones, sure, that's fine,
but the newest 2.5" drives should score between 40
and 100Mbytes/sec.

The drive you listed is a WD 250GB mobile drive, PATA interface.
I have a very similar WD drive here (WD2500BEAS) that regularly
tops 60Mbytes/sec with "hdparm -t".

The difference could easily be in the chipset used to communicate
with the drive.  You said "serverworks" driver, and "pata-serverworks".
The kernel start up logs will have more information,
including the timing info chosen by libata.

Cheers

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-24 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-23 20:37 strange hdparm results with serverworks and pata-serverworks Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-02-23 20:49 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-02-23 22:10   ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-02-24 13:29 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-02-24 18:37   ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-02-24 22:39     ` Mark Lord
2009-02-25  9:44       ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-02-25 16:26         ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A3F63A.2080805@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.