From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Warren Togami Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Move actually mounting the root filesystem into its own series of hooks. Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:45:28 -0500 Message-ID: <49A41618.2020807@redhat.com> References: <3188506a1f06de54ee7874fc45261f5c2faf9e79.1235283966.git.victor.lowther@gmail.com> <49A301FF.2090303@redhat.com> <49A3A924.9000003@bfh.ch> <1235474964.28090.53.camel@sentry-no.fnordovax.org> <82ecf08e0902240435v5ebbb37clea8c8148ce19fa95@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <82ecf08e0902240435v5ebbb37clea8c8148ce19fa95-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Thiago Galesi wrote: >>> Warren Togami wrote: >>> A question: Why not use root=/dev/nfs and the other options according to >>> kernel doc, like nfsroot=... and ip=autoconf? For me that is much more >>> readable. >> It is a matter of taste and historical contingency, I suppose. The >> current nfsroot mounting stuff was added way before initramfs/initrd was >> an option, and it was probably easier to not mess up the in-kernel root= >> handling code (which expected a device to mount). > > > I think it is important to keep backwards compatibility in this > specific case, and handle "root=/dev/nfs" kind of stuff. Really, think > about keeping 2, 3 different cmdlines depending if the system is newer > or older. It may look like a small hassle, but getting this right > sometimes takes some time Who's tools handled "root=/dev/nfs"? /dev/nfs cannot be a valid dev node? Warren Togami wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html