From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Frank van der Linden <Frank.Vanderlinden@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] RAS(Part II)--MCA enalbing in XEN
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:47:44 -0700
Message-ID: <49A45CF0.6080807@Sun.COM>
References: <C5BF30B3.2C2B%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
	<200902181905.55015.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
	<E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401C7AAC7A0@PDSMSX501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<200902191725.32556.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
	<E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401C7AACC2B@PDSMSX501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<499F1A1A.2080808@Sun.COM>
	<E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401C7B24F23@PDSMSX501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<49A4423F.7070702@Sun.COM>
	<2E9E6F5F5978EF44A8590E339E888CF988279945@irsmsx503.ger.corp.intel.com>
	<49A44564.3080505@Sun.COM>
	<2E9E6F5F5978EF44A8590E339E888CF98827996D@irsmsx503.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-reply-to: <2E9E6F5F5978EF44A8590E339E888CF98827996D@irsmsx503.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>, "Ke,
	Liping" <liping.ke@intel.com>, Gavin Maltby <Gavin.Maltby@Sun.COM>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Kleen, Andi wrote:
>> Kleen, Andi wrote:
> 
> So it's generally better to inject generic events, not just blindly forward.
> 

Agreed. I can see advantages to the vMCE code, but it has to deliver 
something to the domU that makes it do something reasonable. That's why 
I have some doubts about the patch that was sent, it doesn't quite seem 
to achieve that (certainly not without translating the address).

- Frank