All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Francesco Gringoli <francesco.gringoli@ing.unibs.it>,
	Lorenzo Nava <navalorenx@gmail.com>
Cc: wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Latest test  with open-source firmware
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:00:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A56B1F.80702@lwfinger.net> (raw)

Francesco and Lorenzo,

In my latest test, I cut the RX and TX queue depths to 32 and ran my usual
stress test. This time I logged whenever there was an increase in the depth of
the txstatus queue, and whenever the queue depth was 16. The results were as
follows:

Feb 24 19:27:08 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 2
Feb 24 19:27:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 3
Feb 24 19:27:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 4
Feb 24 19:27:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 5
Feb 24 19:27:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 6
Feb 24 19:27:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 7
Feb 24 19:27:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 8
Feb 24 19:27:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 9
Feb 24 19:27:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 10
Feb 24 19:28:46 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 11
Feb 25 00:07:19 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 12
Feb 25 00:07:19 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 13
Feb 25 00:09:12 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 14
Feb 25 00:09:50 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 15
Feb 25 00:09:50 mtech kernel: b43: Max Queue depth is now 16
Feb 25 00:09:50 mtech kernel: b43: Max queue depth at 16
Feb 25 00:09:54 mtech kernel: b43: Max queue depth at 16
Feb 25 00:10:55 mtech kernel: b43: Max queue depth at 16
Feb 25 00:26:24 mtech kernel: eth1: No ProbeResp from current AP
00:1a:70:46:ba:b1 - assume out of range

The 00:26:24 event was the interface going offline. That happens with
proprietary firmware, thus I think that problem is with the driver, rather than
the firmware. In any case, I got no out-of-order cookies or poisoned skb's.
There were no dropped packets nor PHY transmission errors. The above list is all
the b43 messages in the log.

I have reset the RX queue depth to the original value of 64 and have started
another test. I would expect this change to have no effect, but I'll keep you
informed.

Larry

             reply	other threads:[~2009-02-25 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-25 16:00 Larry Finger [this message]
2009-02-25 17:46 ` Latest test with open-source firmware Michael Buesch
2009-02-25 18:35   ` Larry Finger
2009-02-25 18:36     ` Michael Buesch
2009-02-25 21:30 ` Francesco Gringoli
2009-02-26  0:31   ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A56B1F.80702@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=francesco.gringoli@ing.unibs.it \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=navalorenx@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.