From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: pv_ops & gntdev? Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:35:38 -0800 Message-ID: <49A5B9AA.7010709@goop.org> References: <49A44030.2070709@redhat.com> <49A4640E.1000807@goop.org> <49A470DD.2000008@redhat.com> <49A517F6.30005@redhat.com> <49A58506.2020407@goop.org> <49A58FFF.3050604@redhat.com> <49A5A4BD.7080207@goop.org> <49A5B5DD.60309@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49A5B5DD.60309@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Xen Development Mailing List List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> Hm, I hope not. Doesn't it always end up using set_pte*? >> > > ptep_get_and_clear_full(); > > See zap_pte_range() in mm/memory.c Ah, right. It could be changed to use ptep_modify_prot_start/commit. That would make it batchable too. Slightly less good for native. J