From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.22.125.45] (helo=wiki.koala.it) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LcgF4-00018q-Qd for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:25:34 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wiki.koala.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4D02C810 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wiki.koala.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wiki.koala.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kg3LpQrxfOEA for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (host56-7-static.30-87-b.business.telecomitalia.it [87.30.7.56]) by wiki.koala.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3978C2C7FD for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <49A69786.9080702@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:22:14 +0100 From: Marco Cavallini Organization: Marco Cavallini - Bergamo - Italia User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <49A513AA.9080201@gefanuc.com> <49A56CE3.1060305@gefanuc.com> In-Reply-To: <49A56CE3.1060305@gefanuc.com> Subject: Re: Discussion regarding the future of OpenEmbedded mailing lists X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:25:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Martyn Welch ha scritto: >> To be honest, I am somewhat confused by the naming of the lists. >> If I understand correctly, the intent of the new lists are >> >> OE-private: core-team. >> All the other projects I know of would call this list >> FOOBAR-devel >> >> OE-devel: rest of the world. >> All the other projects I know of would call this list >> FOOBAR-users >> >> Is there any reason for this strange (that is: non-standard) naming >> scheme? Is OE-private meant to contain really private (confidential?) >> traffic? If not, I'd guess many people (like me) would mis-interpret >> the intent of this list. > > Yes - it is my understanding that the traffic on Openembedded-private is > really private (I believe that OpenEmbedded is now legally registered as > a non-profit in Germany and I should imagine there are certain > discussions which need a degree of privacy). IMHO this behaviour would appear like whether OE was yet another company/competitor in the embedded market rather than an open source project, achieving the opposite effect than expected. /marco