From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.219.166] (helo=mail-ew0-f166.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lcium-0002QJ-Gm for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:16:48 +0100 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so693448ewy.12 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.13.17 with SMTP id 17mr1020351ebm.45.1235664806693; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? (94-193-93-235.zone7.bethere.co.uk [94.193.93.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm26366eyg.37.2009.02.26.08.13.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:13:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49A6BFA5.4070405@xora.org.uk> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:13:25 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] update opkg* SRCREV to 201 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:16:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Koen Kooi wrote: > On 25-02-09 21:46, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was getting seriously annoyed with the useless error codes opkg was >> giving me and Tick pointed me to: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=6&can=1 >> >> We're at 197 now in OE (with r201 applied as patch). I'd like to get >> r199 and r200 in as well, and since I'm lazy I though we'd get r198 in >> as well, which means instead of adding a few patches I can just bump up >> SRCREV to 201. >> >> What do you think? > > Noone is thinking anything? > Sorry been AFK, my opinion of these things is always no-one will test until stuff is committed anyway. So you might as well go ahead! Without the bug reports tick won't be able to improve opkg. Graeme (XorA)