From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: help with reflog Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:24:57 +0100 Message-ID: <49A79549.1020802@viscovery.net> References: <450196A1AAAE4B42A00A8B27A59278E709E04E87@EXCHANGE.trad.tradestation.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: John Dlugosz X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 27 08:26:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lcx77-0006As-T4 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:26:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754276AbZB0HZG (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:25:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754132AbZB0HZE (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:25:04 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:43252 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753833AbZB0HZD (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:25:03 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lcx5d-00011v-MD; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:24:58 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709BB6C4; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:24:57 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) In-Reply-To: <450196A1AAAE4B42A00A8B27A59278E709E04E87@EXCHANGE.trad.tradestation.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: John Dlugosz schrieb: > My Log for 'HEAD' only has 14 entries. Shouldn't it go back for 90 days? Did you initialize or clone *this*particular*repository* more than 90 days ago? > I see nothing in the 'config' file. Are you saying that the .git/config file is empty? What does 'git config core.logallrefupdates' report? -- Hannes