From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: more timeouts that reach -1
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:16:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A803C2.4070702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A5286D.80304@gmail.com>
Roel Kluin wrote:
> These were not previously reported by me.
> ------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
> with while (timeout-- > 0); timeout reaches -1 after the loop, so the tests
> below are off by one.
I just noticed that in drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c after my patch this still
won't give an err, because timeout is unsigned
------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
with while (timeout-- > 0); timeout reaches -1 after the loop, so the tests
below are off by one. also don't do an '< 0' test on an unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
index 1cf2f94..f3a1274 100644
--- a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ ks8695_reset(struct ks8695_priv *ksp)
msleep(1);
}
- if (reset_timeout == 0) {
+ if (reset_timeout < 0) {
dev_crit(ksp->dev,
"Timeout waiting for DMA engines to reset\n");
/* And blithely carry on */
diff --git a/drivers/net/jme.c b/drivers/net/jme.c
index 08b3405..0173ed0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/jme.c
+++ b/drivers/net/jme.c
@@ -957,7 +957,8 @@ jme_process_receive(struct jme_adapter *jme, int limit)
goto out_inc;
i = atomic_read(&rxring->next_to_clean);
- while (limit-- > 0) {
+ while (limit > 0) {
+ limit--;
rxdesc = rxring->desc;
rxdesc += i;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
index 5463591..0ada4ed 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ int uec_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int mii_id, int regnum)
static int uec_mdio_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
{
struct ucc_mii_mng __iomem *regs = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
- unsigned int timeout = PHY_INIT_TIMEOUT;
+ int timeout = PHY_INIT_TIMEOUT;
mutex_lock(&bus->mdio_lock);
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int uec_mdio_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
mutex_unlock(&bus->mdio_lock);
- if (timeout <= 0) {
+ if (timeout < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: The MII Bus is stuck!\n", bus->name);
return -EBUSY;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-25 11:15 [PATCH] net: more timeouts that reach -1 Roel Kluin
2009-02-27 11:43 ` Guo-Fu Tseng
2009-02-27 15:37 ` roel kluin
2009-02-27 15:51 ` Guo-Fu Tseng
2009-02-27 16:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Roel Kluin
2009-03-04 8:10 ` David Miller
2009-02-27 15:16 ` Roel Kluin [this message]
2009-03-04 8:05 ` [PATCH] " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A803C2.4070702@gmail.com \
--to=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.