From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kenny Chang <kchang@athenacr.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multicast packet loss
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:12:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A84916.9090106@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902271441220.9381@qirst.com>
Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Christoph Lameter a ?crit :
>>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>> 2.6.29-rc contains UDP receive improvements (lockless)
>>>> Problem is multicast handling was not yet updated, but could be :)
>>> When will that happen?
>> When proven necessary :)
>>
>> Kenny problem is about scheduling storm. The extra spin_lock() in UDP
>> multicast receive is not a problem.
>
> My tests here show that 2.6.29-rc5 still looses ~5usec vs. 2.6.22 via
> UDP. This would fix a regression.....
>
Could you elaborate ?
I just retried Kenny test here. As one cpu is looping in ksoftirqd, only this cpu
touches the spin_lock, so spin_lock()/spin_unlock() is free.
oprofile shows that udp stack is lightweight in this case. Problem is about wakeing up
so many threads...
CPU: Core 2, speed 3000.16 MHz (estimated)
Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a unit mask of 0x00 (Unhalted core cycles) count 100000
samples cum. samples % cum. % symbol name
356857 356857 15.1789 15.1789 schedule
274028 630885 11.6557 26.8346 mwait_idle
189218 820103 8.0484 34.8829 __skb_recv_datagram
116903 937006 4.9725 39.8554 skb_release_data
103152 1040158 4.3876 44.2430 lock_sock_nested
89600 1129758 3.8111 48.0541 udp_recvmsg
74171 1203929 3.1549 51.2089 copy_to_user
72299 1276228 3.0752 54.2842 set_next_entity
60392 1336620 2.5688 56.8529 sched_clock_cpu
54026 1390646 2.2980 59.1509 __slab_free
50212 1440858 2.1358 61.2867 prepare_to_wait_exclusive
38689 1479547 1.6456 62.9323 cpu_idle
38142 1517689 1.6224 64.5547 __switch_to
36701 1554390 1.5611 66.1157 hrtick_start_fair
36673 1591063 1.5599 67.6756 dst_release
36268 1627331 1.5427 69.2183 sys_recvfrom
35052 1662383 1.4909 70.7092 kmem_cache_free
32680 1695063 1.3900 72.0992 pick_next_task_fair
31209 1726272 1.3275 73.4267 try_to_wake_up
30382 1756654 1.2923 74.7190 dequeue_task_fair
29048 1785702 1.2356 75.9545 __copy_skb_header
28801 1814503 1.2250 77.1796 sock_def_readable
28655 1843158 1.2188 78.3984 enqueue_task_fair
27232 1870390 1.1583 79.5567 update_curr
21688 1892078 0.9225 80.4792 copy_from_user
18832 1910910 0.8010 81.2802 sysenter_past_esp
17732 1928642 0.7542 82.0345 finish_task_switch
17583 1946225 0.7479 82.7824 resched_task
17367 1963592 0.7387 83.5211 native_sched_clock
15691 1979283 0.6674 84.1885 task_rq_lock
15352 1994635 0.6530 84.8415 sock_queue_rcv_skb
15022 2009657 0.6390 85.4804 udp_queue_rcv_skb
13999 2023656 0.5954 86.0759 __update_sched_clock
12284 2035940 0.5225 86.5984 skb_copy_datagram_iovec
11869 2047809 0.5048 87.1032 release_sock
10986 2058795 0.4673 87.5705 __wake_up_sync
10488 2069283 0.4461 88.0166 sock_recvmsg
9686 2078969 0.4120 88.4286 skb_queue_tail
9425 2088394 0.4009 88.8295 sys_socketcall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-30 17:49 Multicast packet loss Kenny Chang
2009-01-30 19:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 19:17 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-01-30 20:03 ` Neil Horman
2009-01-30 22:29 ` Kenny Chang
2009-01-30 22:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-31 16:03 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-02 16:13 ` Kenny Chang
2009-02-02 16:48 ` Kenny Chang
2009-02-03 11:55 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-03 15:20 ` Kenny Chang
2009-02-04 1:15 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-04 16:07 ` Kenny Chang
2009-02-04 16:46 ` Wesley Chow
2009-02-04 18:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-05 13:33 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-05 13:46 ` Wesley Chow
2009-02-05 13:29 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-01 12:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-02 13:45 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-02 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-02 18:22 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-02 19:51 ` Wes Chow
2009-02-02 20:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-02 21:09 ` Wes Chow
2009-02-02 21:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-03 17:34 ` Kenny Chang
2009-02-04 1:21 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-26 17:15 ` Kenny Chang
2009-02-28 8:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-01 17:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-04 8:16 ` David Miller
2009-03-04 8:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-07 7:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-08 16:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-09 2:49 ` David Miller
2009-03-09 6:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-13 21:51 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 22:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-13 22:38 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 22:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-14 9:03 ` [PATCH] net: reorder fields of struct socket Eric Dumazet
2009-03-16 2:59 ` David Miller
2009-03-16 22:22 ` Multicast packet loss Eric Dumazet
2009-03-17 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-17 11:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-17 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-17 15:00 ` Brian Bloniarz
2009-03-17 15:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-17 19:39 ` David Stevens
2009-03-17 21:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-03 19:28 ` Brian Bloniarz
2009-04-05 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-06 21:53 ` Brian Bloniarz
2009-04-06 22:12 ` Brian Bloniarz
2009-04-07 20:08 ` Brian Bloniarz
2009-04-08 8:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-09 22:56 ` Brian Bloniarz
2009-03-10 5:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-10 23:22 ` Brian Bloniarz
2009-03-11 3:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 15:47 ` Brian Bloniarz
2009-03-12 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-27 18:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-27 18:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-27 19:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-27 20:12 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-02-27 21:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-02 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-05 14:42 bmb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A84916.9090106@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kchang@athenacr.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.