All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, sqazi@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, mm: pass in 'total' to __copy_from_user_*nocache()
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:40:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A9E7A3.4050102@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090228173813.6d86c0ef@infradead.org>

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> the reason that movntq and co are faster is because you avoid the
> write-allocate behavior of the caches....
> 
> the cache polluting part of it I find hard to buy for general use (as
> this discussion shows)... that will be extremely hard to measure as
> a real huge thing, while the WA part is like a 1.5x to 2x thing.
> 

Note that hardware *can* (which is not the same thing as hardware
*will*) elide the write-allocate behavior.  We did that at Transmeta for
rep movs and certain other instructions which provably filled in entire
cache lines.  I haven't investigated if newer Intel CPUs do that in the
"fast rep movs" case.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-01  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-24  2:03 Performance regression in write() syscall Salman Qazi
2009-02-24  4:10 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-24  4:28   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-24  9:02     ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-24 15:52       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-24 16:24         ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-24 16:51         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25  3:23         ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-25  7:25           ` [patch] x86, mm: pass in 'total' to __copy_from_user_*nocache() Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25  8:09             ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-25  8:29               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25  8:59                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-25 12:01                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25 16:04             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-25 16:29               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-27 12:05               ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-28  8:29                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 11:49                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-28 12:58                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 17:16                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-28 17:24                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-28 17:42                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-28 17:53                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-28 18:05                             ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-28 18:27                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 18:39                               ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-02 10:39                                 ` [PATCH] x86, mm: dont use non-temporal stores in pagecache accesses Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 18:52                               ` [patch] x86, mm: pass in 'total' to __copy_from_user_*nocache() Linus Torvalds
2009-03-01 14:19                                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-01  0:06                             ` David Miller
2009-03-01  0:40                               ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-01  0:28                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-01  0:38                                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-01  1:48                                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-01  1:38                                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-01  1:40                                         ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-03-01 14:06                                           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-02  4:46                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-02  6:18                                               ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-02 21:16                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-02 21:25                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03  4:30                                                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-03  4:20                                               ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-03  9:02                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04  3:37                                                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-01  2:07                                         ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-24  5:43   ` Performance regression in write() syscall Salman Qazi
2009-02-24 10:09 ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-24 16:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 16:51     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A9E7A3.4050102@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=sqazi@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.