From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Lepxj-0000IW-Sw for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:12:35 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lepxh-0000IP-Su for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:12:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lepxg-0000H7-Gj for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:12:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44681 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lepxg-0000H4-A7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:12:32 -0500 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:50775 helo=kirsi2.inet.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lepxf-00009T-P1 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:12:32 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (84.248.105.254) by kirsi2.inet.fi (8.5.014) id 49ACED3A000FF5E4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:12:30 +0200 Message-ID: <49AE702C.4000508@nic.fi> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:12:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vesa_J=E4=E4skel=E4inen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20090303.181539.225802738.davem@davemloft.net> <49AE6B0D.2080106@nic.fi> <20090304.035629.123861313.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20090304.035629.123861313.davem@davemloft.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7]: Get cob-webs out of sparc64-ieee1275.rmk X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:12:34 -0000 David Miller wrote: > Are you going to apply my patches or do I have to rewrite > everything? Personally I have nothing against resurrecting sparc support :) Lets see what kind of other comments they generate...