From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenfb shared buffer
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:32:00 +0100
Message-ID: <49AE74C0.4070909@redhat.com>
References: <49AD7114.2080002@eu.citrix.com> <49AE329B.9060400@redhat.com>
	<49AE6FC6.9080307@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <49AE6FC6.9080307@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> I am OK with these changes but I wouldn't bother removing the 16 and 32
> bpp conversion code even if currently it would never be used.
> After all is working and well tested code that may be useful in the
> future.

Well I killed it intentionally.  That way we'll notice for sure if xenfb
doesn't share the buffer although it should.  Restoring the
functionality in case we ever need it again is easy as all the magic is
in the BLT() macro anyway.

cheers
  Gerd