From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Re: pv_ops & gntdev?
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:32:46 +0100
Message-ID: <49AE9F1E.3040209@redhat.com>
References: <49A44030.2070709@redhat.com>	<49A4640E.1000807@goop.org>	<49A470DD.2000008@redhat.com>	<49A517F6.30005@redhat.com>	<49A58506.2020407@goop.org>	<49A58FFF.3050604@redhat.com>	<49A5A4BD.7080207@goop.org>	<49A5B5DD.60309@redhat.com>	<49A5B9AA.7010709@goop.org>	<49A5BB7E.8030503@redhat.com>	<49A5BC9D.5010801@goop.org>	<49A5C208.2040509@redhat.com>	<49A5C5FB.6080000@goop.org>	<49A5C957.7060205@redhat.com>	<49A5CD57.2010300@goop.org>	<49AC635F.5010906@redhat.com>
	<49ADB656.7080404@goop.org>	<49AE396D.2090503@redhat.com>
	<49AE9592.2060202@redhat.com> <49AE9B6B.6070301@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <49AE9B6B.6070301@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> Yes, but it *looks* better ;)

indeed ;)

> Yes, my "cleanup" will have screwed up the
> actual functional parts in that case.   Hiding the PAGE_MASK in a
> tactical application of PAGE_OFFSET will probably help make it clearer.

Well, maybe there is a macro for that, the name is *not* PAGE_OFFSET though.

cheers,
  Gerd