From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: Design document of Kemari
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:48:22 +0900
Message-ID: <49B153D6.6080100@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <C5D5D16C.43DE%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
	<49B073C5.6080702@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<20090306162849.GA31979@movementarian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090306162849.GA31979@movementarian.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:52:21AM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for your quick review.
>> I'm glad my messages have finally reached to the list.
> 
> I wonder how Kemari differs from Remus?
> 
> regards
> john
> 
> 
> 
I believe Kemari and Remus shares a lot in common.
Stephen and Ian have described both Kemari and Remus on the roadmap document, 
and that might help for quick review.

http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/12/08/xen-roadmap-document-2/

In short, Kemari transfers the guest VM on event-driven, while Remus transfers 
on specific interval.

Thanks,

Yoshi